![]() What we compare them to today commits a gross error. When it comes right down to it, they did tend to be better made than medieval western swords. On top of that, the Japanese sword's ability to be easily removed from the handle for maintenance and storage by the simple removal of a peg is something you don't see in most other swords of the time. Japanese swords, by comparison, tend to be much, much more homogeneous than medieval western swords, that tend to wildly vary in carbon distribution even within a few inches of blade length, and show NO signs of any kind of heat treatment at all. In fact, new findings in the analysis of medieval western swords of similar time periods were, metallurgically specifically, actually far inferior to better made Japanese swords, even though the Japanese had worse smelting technology, the folding evened out carbon distribution and slag. ![]() If you ask someone why they mock the folding, it's likely they don't have a proper answer aside from insulting weebs (and their reasoning that more folds = better), along with misunderstandings in response to misunderstandings. A lot of people seem to think they're folded thousands to a million times, but really it's typically about 12 or 13 times - because at 4-8k layers, the steel is already quite homogenous enough. Though a good bunch of these are intended for humour - or at least I'd hope.Įxtra information - Katana were indeed folded, but only up to 20 times on average, which creates over a million layers. These "katana suck" arguments are easy to find because they're just a simple extremist statement (not politically) that people make because it doesn't require the same effort it takes to look at historical arms with the nuance they deserve (simply calling something plainly terrible is easier than understanding its strengths and limitations). But it's a sword, and only as good as any sword could be. It's good for what it was, and what it was made for. It's a bit of the Dunning-Krueger effect where people who know just enough to realise it's not legendary conclude that it must then be crap. Topics on the subject are not prohibited, but readers are encouraged to link to this topic explaining the official stance. We do not condone the modern-day use of swords as actual weapons. Finally, be aware that Reddit automatically shadow-blocks posts that link to your own materials too often as mods we have zero ability to stop this. Also, avoid posting many similar topics in a very short period (e.g. This isn't a classifieds list, but we do welcome makers, sellers, and teachers willing to engage with the community. You can promote your own works and services, as long as you identify them as such. Vote spamming is not just rude but dishonest. If you are tired of newbie questions, it is better to link wiki posts or old topics than to spread negativity. ![]() Debate is welcome, but don't demean others, and exercise tact regarding people's property. Real swords, decorative, historical, fantasy humor, social, ID requests, shopping help, art all sword-related topics are welcome (we are not very strict about topicality)! Please check out the wiki! How to use (#s)īe civil. A subreddit for enthusiasts, practitioners, collectors, and investigators of swords (and related historical weapons).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |